Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Blog 18 - Answer 2


1.  What is your EQ?
What qualities can an architect incorporate into a design to evoke a desired psychological effect?

2.  What is your first answer? (In complete thesis statement format)
Qualities an architect can incorporate into a design to evoke a desired psychological effect is changing the structural, lighting, and audio aspect to inspire creativity. 

3.  What is your second answer? (In complete thesis statement format)
Qualities an architect can incorporate into a design to evoke a desired psychological effect is changing the structural functions in a room to inspire health. 

4.  List three reasons your answer is true with a real-world application for each.
1.) You heal better with a better environment, which in my case architecture comes in. Such as a hospital, the way you design a room or the building itself. 
2.) Putting someone's mind in the right set can help them feel better, which architecture can be a sense of security. 
3.) Having a sense of control in what you do you feel more empowered. That is what architecture can do, control functions within a building. 

5.  What printed source best supports your answer?
Cladwell, Delia, and David Martin. "Five Ways Design Can Make Doctors' Visits Shorter." Five Ways Design Can Make Doctors' Visits Shorter. N.p., 4 Feb. 2016. Web. 5 Feb. 2016.

6.  What other source supports your answer?
My mentor. 

7.  Tie this together with a  concluding thought.
Architecture can have a positive effect in a person state. The way a building is designed and the functions it has can ultimately benefit someones health. 

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Blog 17 - Interview 3 Reflection


1. What is the most important thing I learned from the interview?  
The most important thing I learned for my interview is a possible answer for my essential question. 

2.  How has your approach to interviewing changed over the course of your senior project?
It narrowed down on what I want to ask and where I want to focus. Not a huge change but there is a change from my old, bland questions I would say. 

Interview 3

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Blog 16 - Independent Component 2 Approval


1.  Describe in detail what you plan to do for your 30 hours.
Well to be honest, I don't know what to do yet. I am thinking to either do an additional 30 mentor hours with my mentor or with possibly another mentor, if I am able to find one that focuses on a different aspect of architecture, or I can take an architecture class. I can take one online, there are some free classes. 

2.  Discuss how or what you will do to meet the expectation of showing 30 hours of evidence.
What I can do is log my hours if I do additional 30 hours or if I take a online class of my topic I can provide proof of my class. Possibly showing my grade, unless my grade is humiliating to my family's pride. 

3.  Explain how this component will help you explore your topic in more depth.
Having a different mentor and taking a class gives me a different perspective on how to view and take on architecture. I been viewing it my way as well as my mentors. It provides a different way oth thinking and a way to expand on where I want to go. 

4.  Post a log in your Senior Project Hours link and label it "Independent Component 2" log.
Sure thing. 

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Independent Component 1


Literal 
I, Christian (Lego) Legaspino, affirm that I have completed my independent component which represents 34 hours and 30 minutes of work. During my independent component, I did not use a written source to help complete my project. What I did use and reference for help was my mentor's coworker, Bob L., who works at CMC Architects and Engineers. What I did for my independent component was build a model of one of my mentor's client's house. My mentor gave me the task and I used this opportunity as my independent component. So as I stated, I built someones house to give the client a representation of what their house will look like. I built a exact replica of what the house will look like. From the facade of the building to the roofing. 

Interpretive
Oh this project took over 30 hours alright. Making a professional model for my mentor's client when I have little to none experience is not an easy task. I had a hard time cutting, gluing, and keeping the model clean. 


This was the beginning stages of my model. Looks neat doesn't it? This is when I first started piecing the facades of the building together. These are the main walls of the building. The front section of the house was a whole new thing. Because the house is proportional to the real thing, the spacing and alignment of these walls needed to be on point. Which in my eyes were pretty darn well. Then I cut of more walls or features of the house and attached it to the house. The detailing of the house took a while. You think that would be the easy part or let along the easy part, but boy am I wrong. If I mess up gluing the detail onto the walls...I ruin the aesthetic appeal of it (which I learned the hard way). 


Pretty nice, huh? 


How about this angle? Looking good. 

This model took a lot of work. I had to be delicate so I would not break it while also being careful so I keep the model looking nice. What it is laying on is the foundation of the place the actual house will be at. The contour of the lade and how the house will be laid respected to its surroundings. 

Applied
This helped me with the foundation of my senior topic by the design aspect and the precision of how the pieces are fitted in. Because of the way the house was built I can see the functionality of things. Such as the spacing of rooms, or even why some things are placed the way they are. 

Blog 15 - Lesson 2 Reflection

Image result for feeling of relief

1.What are you most proud of in your Lesson 2 Presentation and why?

What I am most proud of in my Lesson 2 Presentation is that I kept my cool and did not choke. Man, what a relief. In my first presentation, I forgot what I was going to say and I went silent. Not this time! I was able to to complete my 10-minute lecture content and finished my lecture with all that I needed to say. 

2. a.     What assessment would you give yourself on your Lesson 2 Presentation (self-assessment)?

I would give myself a P. 

     b.     Explain why you deserve that grade using evidence from the Lesson 2 component contract.

I would give myself a P because I think I had a pretty solid presentation. I did what was required of me, I turned in what I needed to, I did my 10-minute lecture time, I provided an answer, I was engaging to the audience, and I dressed fairly nicely. 

3. What worked for you in your Lesson 2?

What worked for me in my Lesson 2, would be real life scenarios and pictures, a lot of pictures. Using real life scenarios and pictures help explain what I am trying to present on. Clarifies it better. 

4. What didn't work? If you had a time machine, what would you have done differently to improve your Lesson 2?

To be honest, I do not know what did not work during my presentation. I think everything went fine. Probably I would try to add jokes or funny images to capture my audience attention more. 

5. What do you think your answer #2 is going to be?

What I think will be my answer #2 is... health. Yes, health. What does architecture have to do about health? Well you would need to attend my 3rd presentation.